You are not logged in.
Hi everybody!
I have an ordered file list in this form:
0001.jpg
0002.jpg
0003.jpg
0004.jpg
0005.jpg
0006.jpg
Often I add a new file within the list:
0001.jpg
0002.jpg
0003.jpg
0004.jpg
0004-new.jpg
0005.jpg
0006.jpg
Trying to rename the files with my simple renaming preset causes logically a conflict at "0004-new.jpg", because "0005.jpg" already exists (see screenshot at the end of this post):
1. DELETE – Delete from Position 1 until the End (skip extension)
2. SERIALIZE – Incremental from 1 repeat 1 step 1 and pad to length 4 as Prefix
Also other options in the Serialize section don't work ("Replace current name"...), because "0005.jpg" already exists.
So, to rename, I first run another preset that adds something to the file names:
x-0001.jpg
x-0002.jpg
x-0003.jpg
x-0004.jpg
x-0004-new.jpg
x-0005.jpg
x-0006.jpg
Now my simple renaming preset works:
0001.jpg
0002.jpg
0003.jpg
0004.jpg
0005.jpg
0006.jpg
0007.jpg
But I think it's stupid to run every time TWO presets. What can I do to rename my files in this case with just ONE preset?
Best wishes,
Fiorellino
Screenshot that demonstrates the conflict:
Offline
Just before clicking the Rename button, sort in reverse order by the Name or the New Name column.
ReNamer always processes files sequentially from top to bottom, so sorting in reverse order will ensure that during the renaming the conflicts will not actually materialize.
Give it a try on some test files first, so you can get confident with this approach.
Offline
Just before clicking the Rename button, sort in reverse order by the Name or the New Name column.
ReNamer always processes files sequentially from top to bottom, so sorting in reverse order will ensure that during the renaming the conflicts will not actually materialize.
Give it a try on some test files first, so you can get confident with this approach.
Why can't the program do this sorting automatically at background, without involving the user? why isn't there such an option is settings to allow this?
Offline